Water Report

I finally broke down and had my water tested. I got a W-6 Household Mineral Test from Ward Laboratories, Inc. They have a special order form for home brewers with instructions on how to collect your samples, ship them, and pay for them. They email you your results as a PDF. Here is mine:

Centre Hall Water Report

The first thing to notice is that there are very few minerals in this water.

This is not very hard water (Total hardness as CaCO₃, 140 ppm). There is some disagreement about definitions for hard and soft water. For instance, Wikipedia uses this scale:

Very soft: 0-70 ppm
Soft: 70-140 ppm
Slightly hard: 140-210 ppm
Moderately hard: 210-320 ppm
Hard: 320-530 ppm
Very hard: >530 ppm

…while Ward Labs provides this scale in their Guide (p. 150):

Soft: 0-75 ppm
Moderately hard: 75-150 ppm
Hard: 150-300 ppm
Very hard: >300 ppm

In either case, not hard. Somewhere in the Soft-Slightly hard-Moderately hard range. If it were a report card, it would get a “B.”

 

Since I draw my water out of the same aquifer most everyone else in Happy Valley, Brush Valley, and Penn’s Valley does, you folks ought to seriously consider whether they really need a softener.

Centre County Aquifer

All of that is neither here nor there as far as home brewing is concerned. These are the important parts for brewing:

pH 7.6
Calcium, Ca 51
Magnesium, Mg 3
Bicarbonate, HCO₃ 144
Sulfate, SO₄-S 3
Chloride, Cl 3
Sodium, Na 1

Water by itself does not have much pH buffering capacity and, for a brewer, it is the pH of the mash that is important. The makeup of the grain bill will determine the mash pH. I have included the water pH for completeness because some of the spreadsheets use it. A pH of 7.0 would be perfectly neutral. This water is very slightly alkaline.

 

Calcium is an important mineral by itself and is necessary for yeast to flocculate. A generally accepted minimum concentration is 50 ppm. There is just enough in my water to allow yeast to flocculate. Lucky me.

Calcium is also one of the knobs that brewers have to control mash pH and there are several ways to adjust it.

Magnesium is also an essential yeast nutrient and co-factor for several enzymes during fermentation and mashing, however, you do not need to get it from your water because malt brings it along to the tune of about 130 ppm. My water has very little, but that is not a problem.

Magnesium is the other knob on mash pH, but it only has half the effect of Calcium (so I like to ignore it).

Bicarbonate is the third control on mash pH, but it really is not much of a control. Most people want to reduce it. To make a light-colored beer you want less than 50 ppm. There are two ways to reduce Bicarbonate: 1) by boiling and cooling to remove “temporary hardness” by precipitating CaCO₃ (calcium carbonate), and 2) by diluting with pure water. A grain bill that will result in an amber beer will counteract up to 150 ppm of Bicarbonate. I do not mind brewing amber beers.

So, what do we have so far?

We have three knobs on mash pH: 1) Bicarbonate, which we cannot do much about, and do not have to so long as we target amber beers, 2) Magnesium, which does not do much nor does it seem to matter, and 3) Calcium, which is necessary and has a large effect. In other words: Brew amber beers and adjust mash pH with Calcium.

There are still three things left on the report: Sulfate, Chloride, and Sodium. You should recognize those last two as Sodium Chloride, or Canning Salt. Table Salt contains Iodine, which is toxic to yeast. Do not use it in your beer. The only reason we consider Sodium here is because it comes with Chloride in the form of Salt. Apart from that it really does not do much for beer. That leaves Chloride and Sulfate. It turns out that Sulfate accentuates hop bitterness, while Chloride enhances maltiness. Just as the BU:GU ratio determines the hop-to-malt balance in a beer, the Chloride to Sulfate ratio does, too.

Apparently a ratio below 0.5 is best suited for a very bitter beer style, 0.5 to 0.77 for a bitter style, 0.77 to 1.3 for a balanced style, 1.3 to 2.0 for malty styles, and above 2.0 for very malty styles.

What does that leave us with?

Brew amber beers. Adjust mash pH with Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum) to have reasonable effect on pH while contributing Sulfate. Balance the Sulfate with Chloride using Canning Salt according to the beer style.

Update: A.J. deLange posted over on The Brewing Network forum that we have read the Ward Lab’s report wrong and that the notation “SO₄-S” means “sulfate as sulfur” which further means that to get the real sulfate amount you have to multiply by 3. I think I’m going to have to redo my calculations. :-/

Perhaps everyone except me already knows this but I just discovered yesterday that Ward Labs reports list sulfate as sulfur (i.e the mg/L number means the milligrams of sulfur in the sulfate – not the mass of the sulfate ions themselves). The popular spreadsheets calculate sulfate “as sulfate” (which makes more sense to me). Before entering your reported sulfate number into one of these spreadsheets convert “as sulfur” to “as sulfate” by multiplying by 3.

Update: I asked about my conclusions on the AHA Forum and got the advice to use Calcium Chloride, instead of Canning Salt, to get my Chloride without adding any Sodium. Since this also bring Calcium, I can use less Gypsum to balance the pH.

Why not get some calcium chloride to go along with your calcium sulfate instead of the sodium chloride?

Update: I was reading The Mad Fermentationist’s post on Homebrew Water Treatment and something he said got me thinking:

If you add a significant amount of pure H₂O it is always a good idea to add some yeast nutrient blend, near the end of the boil, which will replace the trace elements that tap water contains (copper, zinc etc…) which are used by the yeast.

While I am not adding pure H₂O, I do have very pure water to start with. Except for the Calcium, there are almost no minerals, and while the test did not specifically measure copper, zinc, and so on, it did test for the more predominate ones and found very little. If there is not much of the normal minerals, I will bet there is not much of the trace minerals, either. That means it might be good for me to use a Yeast Nutrient, which I stopped doing when I switched from Extract to All Grain because I figured the grains brought everything needed to the party.

<

p> 

(19) Sunday, July 4, 2010 Brew Day

Today I am going to make a recipe from Fred Bonjour, of the AHA Governing Committee, that he posted in a thread asking, “Is a good, low ABV IPA possible?”

I weighed and crushed my grains and set up the brewery last night. First thing I need to do today is start heating the strike water.

8:43 — Strike water is heating.

The taste of Simpson’s Golden Promise is not initially sweet, but has a nice malt flavor with a slightly sweet aftertaste.

Weyermann® Light Munich has a nuttier, grainier flavor.

Castle Aromatic is much harder with an earthy flavor.

Flaked Barley is relatively tasteless. Simple flakes of starch.

Briess Caramel 20L tastes vaguely sweet.

Briess Caramel 60L tastes of darker sugars and dried fruit. Beginning to taste slightly burnt.

I got myself a stainless steel dipper. Filled to the brim it holds a quart. It has some markings, but they appear to be in random locations.

9:22 — Mashing. I believe it is 150–152°F. I took a pH reading with some litmus papers and it looks to be about 5.0. Lower than I expected. I will not make any adjustment. I will be back out later to start the sparge water heating.

Update: It could be that “pH papers are made to be used on room temperature samples.”

The hops are supposed to be:

Amount Description IBU
2.00 oz Amarillo (leaf) [9.4 %] (60 min) 72.2 IBU
1.00 oz Cascade [5.5 %] (15 min) 6.3
1.00 oz Cascade [5.5 %] (1 min) 3.9

My Amarillo are pellets, but I use a bag and I understand the gain from the pellets over the leaf and the loss from the bag over loose cancel out. They are also 8.2% alpha acid, but the recipe makes it look like the 2 ounces was the target.

My Cascade are 4.0% AA.

10:29 — Finished infusion and vorlauf and now I am lautering. Mash is not terribly clear. Tastes sweet, but not as sweet as some I have had. The temperature dropped about 5 °F during the mash. I need to learn how to do a starch test. First runnings are 19.2 Brix (1.077 SG). Only got 2.75 gallons from the mash. I expected 3.36 gallons.

10:41 — Sparging. With second runnings the batch comes to 5.75 gallons. Expected 6.71. Almost a gallon short. Second runnings are 6.8 Brix (1.027). Vaguely sweet. Combined gravity is 12.0 Brix (1.047 SG). Should be 12.7 (1.048). Sparging more to make the boil volume would only reduce the boil gravity, so I am going to go with what I have.

10:58 — Heating to boil.

Cleaning mash tun. I scooped out the spent grain into a bowl and stuck it in the fridge so it does not spoil. Gretchen plans to make a spent grain bread.

11:23 — Boiling.

11:25 — Bittering hops are in.

12:10 — Flavor hops are in, as is the immersion chiller so it has time to sanitize.

12:24 — Aroma hops are in.

12:25 — Flame out and chilling.

1:05 — I have given up on chilling. By the way, it helps to turn on the water at the tap. I cannot get the wort below 80 °F. The ground water appears to be about 75 °F. I could be fighting the air temperature and the sun on the garden hose. I am transferring to the carboy and I will chill it further in the refrigerator. Original gravity is 14.5 Brix (1.057 SG). Target was 1.048.

I see now that when I was deciding whether to sparge more I looked at the original gravity, not the boil gravity. The boil gravity should have been 1.041. Since I do not know the volume, I cannot calculate the amount of water to add to fix it. My record stands unbroken!

5:00 — The wort has chilled to about 69 °F, I am going to call it. Pitched the yeast. I rehydrated it in a zip lock bag — something John Palmer recommended in a recent podcast. It worked well and the baggie smelled of peaches when I opened it. The carboy is sitting in the coldest corner of the basement — about 61 °F — with an airlock attached. Everything is cleaned and drying on the porch. The animals are fed and now it is time to grill some pork chops for dinner.

Happy 4th of July everybody!

Update — It is 5:44 a.m. on Tuesday (7/6). Beer is fermenting actively. Temperature is 72 °F. This one could be fruity!

Update — It is Wednesday (7/7). Beer temperature is 75 °F. This is going to be rocket fuel. =(

Update — It is Saturday (7/24). Beer temperature is 74 °F. Bottling with 4 ounces of corn sugar. There is just about 4 gallons of beer. Surprisingly, it does not taste awful. Final gravity is 6.8 Brix (1.008 FG).That seems kind of low, but maybe the insane fermentation temperatures helped it along. That works out to 6.6% ABV and 187 Calories.

Update — It is Saturday (7/31). I put one bottle in the refrigerator yesterday to check the carbonation progress. I just sampled it. It is carbonated. It pours a hazy, turbulent cascade of bubbles with a thick creamy head. It is light copper in color. It has a nice balanced aroma with a mix of citrus hops and beery malt. It is smooth on the tongue with a chewy mouthfeel. Flavor is balanced, as well, with a lasting bitter aftertaste. No sign of any of the off flavors or aromas I expected. Based on how much I messed up this batch, I am surprised it is even drinkable. Now I wonder if I ever try again and get it right, whether I will be disappointed that it does not taste like this one.

If there is anything to learn from this, it is that no matter what you do, you will make beer. It may not be what you were planning, but it will be beer. Relax. Don’t worry. Have a home brew.