New Thermometer

Thermometer icon
Image via Wikipedia

Since I dropped my glass lab thermometer on the driveway and broke it in two during my brew day yesterday, I just ordered myself a Thermapen. I’ve heard great things about them.

(20) Sunday, September 5, 2010 Brew Day — The Beer of India

Thursday, September 2, 2010, 9:52 p.m. I made a starter with two quarts of water, six ounces (by weight) of Briess Pilsner dry malt extract, a quarter teaspoon of Brewer’s Choice™ Wyeast Nutrient Blend, and two Wyeast 1028 London Ale Activator Packs (one dated 08JUN10 lot 0815147, the other 26JUL10 lot 0816196). Shook vigorously and covered with foil.

According to The Secret to Healthy Yeast: Making a Starter, by Jamil Zainasheff:

You do not want to make a high gravity starter to grow yeast. As a ballpark measurement, use about 6 ounces (by weight) of DME to 2 quarts of water… Add ¼ teaspoon of yeast nutrient, boil 15 minutes, cool and add yeast.

Mr Malty’s Pitching Rate Calculator™, based on one pack of the newer yeast, said to use a 2.57 L (2.72 qt.) starter and estimated 70% viability.

 

It estimated a 36% viability for the older pack.

If I combine them I get one pack with 106% viability — it’s cool it actually lets me enter that — and I need a 1.49 L (1.57 qt.) starter.

I went with 2 quarts anyway.

Update: I shook the starter back up occasionally to knock the CO₂ out and introduce some new O₂. At 9:00 a.m. on Saturday, September 4, 2010, I put it in the fridge to drop the yeast out of suspension.

This is my take on Jamil Zainasheff’s “Bière de L’Inde” from Brewing Classic Styles. He gives the recipe on the English IPA episode of The Jamil Show. The name is French for The Beer of India, and seems like a play on the French Bière de Garde, or beer for keeping, style.

This recipe produces five gallons (19 L) of beer for packaging. I assume a loss due to trub of a half-gallon in the fermenter and another half-gallon in the boil kettle. That leaves six gallons (22.7 L) at the end of the boil. I assume a boil-off rate of about one gallon per hour, which means I need 7 gallons (26.5 L) at the start of a 60-minute full-volume boil. I use bagged pellet hops for all hop additions.

Recipe: BVB English IPA

Brewhouse Efficiency: 70% Pre-Boil Volume: 7.0 gallons (26.5 L) BG: 1.053 (13.2 °P) OG: 1.062 (15.2 °P) FG: 1.016 (4 °P) ADF: 75% IBU (Rager): 49.4 BU:GU ratio: 0.79 Balance value: 1.65 ABV: 6.4% Color (Morey): 12 SRM (23 EBC) — Deep amber / light copper Boil: 60 minutes

Grains Weight Percent
Crisp Maris Otter (4 °L) 12.25 lb. (5.55 kg) 86.7
Rahr White Wheat Malt (2.8 °L) 0.5 lb. (227 g) 3.5
Castle Malting Belgian Biscuit (25 °L) 0.5 lb. (227 g) 3.5
Briess Caramel 40L (40 °L) 0.5 lb. (227 g) 3.5
Briess Caramel 120L (120 °L) 6.0 oz. (170 g) 2.7
Hops IBU
Challenger 7% AA, 60 min. 1.7 oz (48 g) 44.5
Fuggles 4% AA, 10 min. 1.5 oz (43 g) 4.9
Kent Goldings 4.8% AA, 0 min. 1.5 oz (43 g) 0
Yeast
Wyeast 1028 London Ale 238B Cells
Brewer’s Choice™ Wyeast Nutrient Blend, 15 min. ½ teaspoon (2.2 g)

Step by Step

A few days ahead of time, make an appropriate starter. Shake intermittently. Cold crash and decant before pitching time.

 

The water should have at least 50 ppm of Calcium, a residual alkalinity between 14 and 73, and a Chloride to Sulfate ratio between 0.5 and 0.77. For my starting water profile, I add 2.3 g Gypsum and 1.5 g Calcium Chloride to the mash and 1.6 g Gypsum and 1.1 g Calcium Chloride to the boil. My resulting water profile is:

Calcium: 102 ppm
Magnesium: 3 ppm
Sodium: 1 ppm
Chloride: 43 ppm
Sulfate: 78 ppm
Residual Alkalinity: 44 — Best for 9–14 SRM
Chloride to Sulfate Ratio: 0.55 — Best for bitter styles

<

p style=”text-align:center;”> 

This is a single step infusion mash at 1.36 quarts/pound with a batch sparge. It will need a total of 8.3 gallons (31.5 L) of water.

 

Preheat the mash tun by bringing the 3.5 gallons (13.2 L) of sparge water to 170°F (77°C) and placing it in the closed mash tun while you heat the strike water.

Heat 4.81 gallons (18.2 L) of strike water to 164 °F (73.3 °C). Drain the sparge water from the preheated mash tun into the boil kettle. Add all but about a gallon of the heated strike water to the mash tun.

Mix in the crushed grain and the mash salts, making sure to break up any dough balls. Cover the mash tun and let it sit for about 10 minutes. The mash should stabilize at 152 °F (66.7 °C). Take a few readings and use the remaining strike water, boiling water, or ice water to adjust the temperature. The volume should be about 5.9 gallons (22.5 L). Cover the mash tun and let it rest. Transfer the sparge water back to the hot liquor tank.

After 60 minutes, vorlauf, and lauter. Sparge with 3.5 gallons (13.2 L) of water to bring the collected volume to about 7 gallons (26.5 L) at 1.053 SG (13.2 °P).

Add the boil salts and boil for 60 minutes. While boiling, add the remaining ingredients according to the schedule in the ingredient list.

After the boil, cool the wort to 68 °F (20 °C). The volume should be about 6.0 gallons (22.7 L) at 1.062 SG (15.2 °P). Transfer about 5.5 gallons (20.8 L) to a sanitized fermenter. Aerate the wort and pitch the yeast.

Hold at 68 °F (20 °C) until fermentation is complete. The final gravity should be about 1.016 SG (4 °P).

Transfer about 5 gallons (18.9 L) to a priming bucket and prime using 3.72 oz (105.5 g) of sugar for about 2.25 volumes of carbonation. Package in 53 12-ounce bottles.

Last Night — Crushed grains and measured out hop additions.

8:15 — Setting up brewery. Heating mash water to preheat mash tun. Heating strike water.

9:00 — Preheating mash tun.

9:23 — Strike water is hot. Draining sparge water from mash tun to hot liquor tank.

9:50 — Adjusted mash temperature to 152 °F. 50 minutes to go. Added mash salts.

Took a sample to cool for mash pH measurement. I’m calling it 5.2. (Woo hoo!)

10:40 — Starting to vorlauf and lauter the first runnings.

10:50 — Sparging. Tried to measure the first runnings gravity with my refractometer, but the screen was entirely blue. Tried it with tap water and it read 0 Brix (as expected). Don’t know what the problem is. Resorted to the hydrometer. Waiting for the sample to cool. 1.072 SG @ 92 °F. I believe my hydrometer is calibrated for 60 °F, so BeerAlchemy says the corrected gravity is 1.076.

Second runnings read 1.022 @ 113 °F which is 1.031 corrected to 60°F.

The combined wort is 1.046 @ 112°F which is 1.055 corrected to 60°F.

The expected boil gravity is 1.053. I’ve got 6.4 gallons. According to Drew Beechum’s Dilution Calculator I need to add a quart to make the adjustment.

I just broke my lab thermometer!

11:26 — Heating to boil. Added boil salts.

12:05 — Boiling.

12:07 — Added bittering hops.

12:50 — Placed wort chiller in kettle. Added yeast nutrient.

12:57 — Added flavor hops.

1:07 — Flame out. Added aroma hops. Chilling.

1:26 — Chilled to 68 °F. Removed hop bag (draining into pot) and chiller. Stirred to create whirlpool and put lid on while the trub settles.

2:03 — Draining wort into the carboy. Original gravity is 1.062. Spot on!

2:25 — Drained. Aerating.

2:39 — Wort is in the cellar.

2:50 — Decanted starter beer and pitched yeast. Cleaning up.

<

p>Update: Saturday, September 25, 2010. Kegged the beer today. Refractometer read 7.8 Brix. With an OG of 1.062, that would make the FG 1.011. Hydrometer read 1.007 at 70 °F, calibrated for 60 °F. That would make the corrected FG 1.008. That would correspond to 7.2 Brix. I think I need to calibrate these. Since  went with the hydrometer to start, I’ll finish with it’s reading, too.  7.2 % ABV. 201 calories per 12 ounce serving. The keg is in the refrigerator at 45 °F under 11 PSI of CO₂. That should give me about 2.2 volumes when it reaches equilibrium.

Water Report

I finally broke down and had my water tested. I got a W-6 Household Mineral Test from Ward Laboratories, Inc. They have a special order form for home brewers with instructions on how to collect your samples, ship them, and pay for them. They email you your results as a PDF. Here is mine:

Centre Hall Water Report

The first thing to notice is that there are very few minerals in this water.

This is not very hard water (Total hardness as CaCO₃, 140 ppm). There is some disagreement about definitions for hard and soft water. For instance, Wikipedia uses this scale:

Very soft: 0-70 ppm
Soft: 70-140 ppm
Slightly hard: 140-210 ppm
Moderately hard: 210-320 ppm
Hard: 320-530 ppm
Very hard: >530 ppm

…while Ward Labs provides this scale in their Guide (p. 150):

Soft: 0-75 ppm
Moderately hard: 75-150 ppm
Hard: 150-300 ppm
Very hard: >300 ppm

In either case, not hard. Somewhere in the Soft-Slightly hard-Moderately hard range. If it were a report card, it would get a “B.”

 

Since I draw my water out of the same aquifer most everyone else in Happy Valley, Brush Valley, and Penn’s Valley does, you folks ought to seriously consider whether they really need a softener.

Centre County Aquifer

All of that is neither here nor there as far as home brewing is concerned. These are the important parts for brewing:

pH 7.6
Calcium, Ca 51
Magnesium, Mg 3
Bicarbonate, HCO₃ 144
Sulfate, SO₄-S 3
Chloride, Cl 3
Sodium, Na 1

Water by itself does not have much pH buffering capacity and, for a brewer, it is the pH of the mash that is important. The makeup of the grain bill will determine the mash pH. I have included the water pH for completeness because some of the spreadsheets use it. A pH of 7.0 would be perfectly neutral. This water is very slightly alkaline.

 

Calcium is an important mineral by itself and is necessary for yeast to flocculate. A generally accepted minimum concentration is 50 ppm. There is just enough in my water to allow yeast to flocculate. Lucky me.

Calcium is also one of the knobs that brewers have to control mash pH and there are several ways to adjust it.

Magnesium is also an essential yeast nutrient and co-factor for several enzymes during fermentation and mashing, however, you do not need to get it from your water because malt brings it along to the tune of about 130 ppm. My water has very little, but that is not a problem.

Magnesium is the other knob on mash pH, but it only has half the effect of Calcium (so I like to ignore it).

Bicarbonate is the third control on mash pH, but it really is not much of a control. Most people want to reduce it. To make a light-colored beer you want less than 50 ppm. There are two ways to reduce Bicarbonate: 1) by boiling and cooling to remove “temporary hardness” by precipitating CaCO₃ (calcium carbonate), and 2) by diluting with pure water. A grain bill that will result in an amber beer will counteract up to 150 ppm of Bicarbonate. I do not mind brewing amber beers.

So, what do we have so far?

We have three knobs on mash pH: 1) Bicarbonate, which we cannot do much about, and do not have to so long as we target amber beers, 2) Magnesium, which does not do much nor does it seem to matter, and 3) Calcium, which is necessary and has a large effect. In other words: Brew amber beers and adjust mash pH with Calcium.

There are still three things left on the report: Sulfate, Chloride, and Sodium. You should recognize those last two as Sodium Chloride, or Canning Salt. Table Salt contains Iodine, which is toxic to yeast. Do not use it in your beer. The only reason we consider Sodium here is because it comes with Chloride in the form of Salt. Apart from that it really does not do much for beer. That leaves Chloride and Sulfate. It turns out that Sulfate accentuates hop bitterness, while Chloride enhances maltiness. Just as the BU:GU ratio determines the hop-to-malt balance in a beer, the Chloride to Sulfate ratio does, too.

Apparently a ratio below 0.5 is best suited for a very bitter beer style, 0.5 to 0.77 for a bitter style, 0.77 to 1.3 for a balanced style, 1.3 to 2.0 for malty styles, and above 2.0 for very malty styles.

What does that leave us with?

Brew amber beers. Adjust mash pH with Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum) to have reasonable effect on pH while contributing Sulfate. Balance the Sulfate with Chloride using Canning Salt according to the beer style.

Update: A.J. deLange posted over on The Brewing Network forum that we have read the Ward Lab’s report wrong and that the notation “SO₄-S” means “sulfate as sulfur” which further means that to get the real sulfate amount you have to multiply by 3. I think I’m going to have to redo my calculations. :-/

Perhaps everyone except me already knows this but I just discovered yesterday that Ward Labs reports list sulfate as sulfur (i.e the mg/L number means the milligrams of sulfur in the sulfate – not the mass of the sulfate ions themselves). The popular spreadsheets calculate sulfate “as sulfate” (which makes more sense to me). Before entering your reported sulfate number into one of these spreadsheets convert “as sulfur” to “as sulfate” by multiplying by 3.

Update: I asked about my conclusions on the AHA Forum and got the advice to use Calcium Chloride, instead of Canning Salt, to get my Chloride without adding any Sodium. Since this also bring Calcium, I can use less Gypsum to balance the pH.

Why not get some calcium chloride to go along with your calcium sulfate instead of the sodium chloride?

Update: I was reading The Mad Fermentationist’s post on Homebrew Water Treatment and something he said got me thinking:

If you add a significant amount of pure H₂O it is always a good idea to add some yeast nutrient blend, near the end of the boil, which will replace the trace elements that tap water contains (copper, zinc etc…) which are used by the yeast.

While I am not adding pure H₂O, I do have very pure water to start with. Except for the Calcium, there are almost no minerals, and while the test did not specifically measure copper, zinc, and so on, it did test for the more predominate ones and found very little. If there is not much of the normal minerals, I will bet there is not much of the trace minerals, either. That means it might be good for me to use a Yeast Nutrient, which I stopped doing when I switched from Extract to All Grain because I figured the grains brought everything needed to the party.

<

p> 

(19) Sunday, July 4, 2010 Brew Day

Today I am going to make a recipe from Fred Bonjour, of the AHA Governing Committee, that he posted in a thread asking, “Is a good, low ABV IPA possible?”

I weighed and crushed my grains and set up the brewery last night. First thing I need to do today is start heating the strike water.

8:43 — Strike water is heating.

The taste of Simpson’s Golden Promise is not initially sweet, but has a nice malt flavor with a slightly sweet aftertaste.

Weyermann® Light Munich has a nuttier, grainier flavor.

Castle Aromatic is much harder with an earthy flavor.

Flaked Barley is relatively tasteless. Simple flakes of starch.

Briess Caramel 20L tastes vaguely sweet.

Briess Caramel 60L tastes of darker sugars and dried fruit. Beginning to taste slightly burnt.

I got myself a stainless steel dipper. Filled to the brim it holds a quart. It has some markings, but they appear to be in random locations.

9:22 — Mashing. I believe it is 150–152°F. I took a pH reading with some litmus papers and it looks to be about 5.0. Lower than I expected. I will not make any adjustment. I will be back out later to start the sparge water heating.

Update: It could be that “pH papers are made to be used on room temperature samples.”

The hops are supposed to be:

Amount Description IBU
2.00 oz Amarillo (leaf) [9.4 %] (60 min) 72.2 IBU
1.00 oz Cascade [5.5 %] (15 min) 6.3
1.00 oz Cascade [5.5 %] (1 min) 3.9

My Amarillo are pellets, but I use a bag and I understand the gain from the pellets over the leaf and the loss from the bag over loose cancel out. They are also 8.2% alpha acid, but the recipe makes it look like the 2 ounces was the target.

My Cascade are 4.0% AA.

10:29 — Finished infusion and vorlauf and now I am lautering. Mash is not terribly clear. Tastes sweet, but not as sweet as some I have had. The temperature dropped about 5 °F during the mash. I need to learn how to do a starch test. First runnings are 19.2 Brix (1.077 SG). Only got 2.75 gallons from the mash. I expected 3.36 gallons.

10:41 — Sparging. With second runnings the batch comes to 5.75 gallons. Expected 6.71. Almost a gallon short. Second runnings are 6.8 Brix (1.027). Vaguely sweet. Combined gravity is 12.0 Brix (1.047 SG). Should be 12.7 (1.048). Sparging more to make the boil volume would only reduce the boil gravity, so I am going to go with what I have.

10:58 — Heating to boil.

Cleaning mash tun. I scooped out the spent grain into a bowl and stuck it in the fridge so it does not spoil. Gretchen plans to make a spent grain bread.

11:23 — Boiling.

11:25 — Bittering hops are in.

12:10 — Flavor hops are in, as is the immersion chiller so it has time to sanitize.

12:24 — Aroma hops are in.

12:25 — Flame out and chilling.

1:05 — I have given up on chilling. By the way, it helps to turn on the water at the tap. I cannot get the wort below 80 °F. The ground water appears to be about 75 °F. I could be fighting the air temperature and the sun on the garden hose. I am transferring to the carboy and I will chill it further in the refrigerator. Original gravity is 14.5 Brix (1.057 SG). Target was 1.048.

I see now that when I was deciding whether to sparge more I looked at the original gravity, not the boil gravity. The boil gravity should have been 1.041. Since I do not know the volume, I cannot calculate the amount of water to add to fix it. My record stands unbroken!

5:00 — The wort has chilled to about 69 °F, I am going to call it. Pitched the yeast. I rehydrated it in a zip lock bag — something John Palmer recommended in a recent podcast. It worked well and the baggie smelled of peaches when I opened it. The carboy is sitting in the coldest corner of the basement — about 61 °F — with an airlock attached. Everything is cleaned and drying on the porch. The animals are fed and now it is time to grill some pork chops for dinner.

Happy 4th of July everybody!

Update — It is 5:44 a.m. on Tuesday (7/6). Beer is fermenting actively. Temperature is 72 °F. This one could be fruity!

Update — It is Wednesday (7/7). Beer temperature is 75 °F. This is going to be rocket fuel. =(

Update — It is Saturday (7/24). Beer temperature is 74 °F. Bottling with 4 ounces of corn sugar. There is just about 4 gallons of beer. Surprisingly, it does not taste awful. Final gravity is 6.8 Brix (1.008 FG).That seems kind of low, but maybe the insane fermentation temperatures helped it along. That works out to 6.6% ABV and 187 Calories.

Update — It is Saturday (7/31). I put one bottle in the refrigerator yesterday to check the carbonation progress. I just sampled it. It is carbonated. It pours a hazy, turbulent cascade of bubbles with a thick creamy head. It is light copper in color. It has a nice balanced aroma with a mix of citrus hops and beery malt. It is smooth on the tongue with a chewy mouthfeel. Flavor is balanced, as well, with a lasting bitter aftertaste. No sign of any of the off flavors or aromas I expected. Based on how much I messed up this batch, I am surprised it is even drinkable. Now I wonder if I ever try again and get it right, whether I will be disappointed that it does not taste like this one.

If there is anything to learn from this, it is that no matter what you do, you will make beer. It may not be what you were planning, but it will be beer. Relax. Don’t worry. Have a home brew.

(18) Tuesday, June 1, 2010 Brew Day

It’s the last day of my vacation and I’m going to brew my Best Bitter. There’s an 80% chance of rain today. AccuWeather says the morning rain should be past by 8:00 a.m. and the afternoon rain shouldn’t start until after 1:00 p.m.

7:38 Collecting ingredients, removed yeast from fridge and smacked, finishing mash and sparge calculations. I’m going to try adding a half-teaspoon of gypsum to the mash.

8:03 It’s raining. Haven’t started to set up yet. Still gathering equipment and ingredients. Printed out recipe and placed in a sheet protector. Finishing my coffee.

9:02 Brewery set up (in the garage). Weighing grains.

Maris Otter is nicely tasty. Like a good breakfast cereal. Nice plump blonde kernels.

Malted wheat tastes about the same. Maybe slightly sweeter or saltier. Crunchier too.

Medium crystal is much crunchier. Sweeter with subtle toasty flavors. A hint of dried cherry.

Pale chocolate is mild with hints of sweetened coffee.

9:14 Grains weighed and crushed.

9:34 Heating mash water.

9:56 Mash water heated. Doughing in.

10:01 Mashing.

10:18 Ran into town to get a replacement propane tank for my empty spare. Got the last one. Remembered I hadn’t added the gypsum to the mash. Added and stirred. Temperature holding steady.

10:29 Collected sparge water.

10:37 Chewing on malted wheat. An oriole just flew by and there’s a pileated squawking nearby. Gretchen thinks they may have a young one this year. Still getting occasional showers.

10:47 Lighter gave out. Had to find matches. Heating sparge water.

10:58 Sanitizing carboy.

11:05 Vorlauf and lautering. First runnings taste like chocolate milk. 15.1 Brix (1.060 SG).

11:15 Forgot to close the drain valve on the kettle. Lost more than half a gallon before I realized what was happening. Just over three gallons of first wort remaining. Floor is wet and sticky. Sparging.

11:22 Second runnings 4.7 Brix (1.019 SG). Total is just shy of 7 gallons at 9.4 Brix (1.037 SG). Don’t know whether to do a 60 minute boil because of the reduced volume or stay with the 90 minutes for the sugar concentration.

11:40 Checked ingredient stash. No DME. Note for future: keep a few pounds of DME on hand. Poured myself a homebrew. Hosed down garage floor.

11:44 I just checked the recipe and the expected boil gravity is 1.033. Even with the loss mine is 1.037. Maybe I’ll go for a 60 minute boil after all. Perhaps my efficiency was higher than expected. Rechecked gravity. Around 10 Brix looks right.

11:52 Checking hops. They’re actually 9.2% AA. Expected 8.5% AA. Should actually use 0.92 oz.

11:59 Boiling… and there goes the alarm test at the VFD.

12:10 Okay. All is not lost. Sky is not falling. I learned a lesson today. There are two valves to remember to close. One on the mash tun, which I remembered. One on the boil kettle, which I did not. Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want. Today I gained experience.

12:30 Bittering hops are in. 0.92 oz of bagged 9.2% AA Centennial pellet hops.

12:50 Lunch is black beans and rice and another homebrew.

1:10 Connected hoses to immersion chiller.

1:12 It’s raining again.

1:15 Immersion chiller in to sanitize. Added Whirlfloc™ tablet.

1:20 Flavor hops added. It’s raining again.

1:30 Aroma hops in. Flame off. Cooling water on. Stirring.

1:51 Chilled. Whirlpooled. Rinsed chiller.

2:00 Draining to carboy.

2:31 Drained. Aerated. In fermentation chamber. Cleaning up.

2:49 12.2 Brix OG (1.048 OG, target was 1.042). Pitched. Currently 69 °F. Set point is 68 °F. Attached heat belt to carboy. Inserted thermowell and temperature probe. Attached airlock.

Note for next time: Save some of the spent grain for bread!

Update: It’s Thursday morning (6/3) and it appears the fermentation is finished. The kreusen is starting to fall and the airlock is slowing down. I guess it makes sense it would be quick. It was a low gravity beer to start with, so there was not much sugar to convert to begin with. I’ll check the gravity later. If it’s done, I’ll add the dry hops.

Update: It’s Thursday evening (6/3) and just checked the gravity. It’s 9 Brix (1.027). The target is 1.012 FG, so it still has a ways to go. I swirled the carboy to rouse the yeast.

Update: It’s Friday evening (6/4) and just checked the gravity again. It’s 6.5 Brix (1.012) which was the target. 4.8% ABV. 158.2 calories per 12 oz. serving. Now to add the dry hops.

Update: It’s Saturday morning (6/5) and I’ve been doing some thinking about this brew. The OG is freaking me out. Recall that I lost about three quarts of the first runnings — the best stuff with the most sugar — onto the floor of my garage. If I had not, and had ended up with an OG of 1.048 instead of my 1.042 target, that would have meant that I would have gotten 80% efficiency. Since I did lose that wort, it means my efficiency would have had to have been even better than 80%. I batch sparge and the last two batches I did were just about 70% efficient. Except for remembering to close the valves I followed the same procedures, so I have no reason to believe this batch should be much more efficient. The only conclusion I can come to is that I measured the weight of the grains wrong. Since the Maris Otter is the biggest contributor, I have to assume I used too much of that.

Update: It’s the following Saturday morning (6/12) and I’m going to bottle today. First I’m going to make up the priming solution so it has a chance to cool by the time I’m otherwise ready. In theory, this is a Best Bitter and Charlie Papazian says¹ that the carbonation level should be between 0.75 and 1.3 volumes of CO₂. I’m going to shoot for the middle and say one volume is my target. It has been fermenting at 68 °F, so I should be starting with around 0.86 volumes already, which means I’m going to need to generate another 0.14 volumes with my priming solution. I’m going to eyeball the volume and say I’ll get 5 gallons and I’m using corn sugar, so I’ll need about 0.37 oz (10.5 g) to get that much.² As a sanity check, that is less than a tablespoon.

I’m going to be using flip-top pint bottles, and if I’ve really got 5 gallons, I’ll need 40 of them.

I checked the gravity again and it came out to 6.2 Brix (1.010 FG). 5.0% ABV. 198.4 calories per pint.

I ended up with 35.5 pints. Given the sugar I added, the actual carbonation will be 1.02 volumes of CO₂, which is close enough to make no difference.

The initial reaction is “nice hoppy aroma, tastes like hop juice.” Maybe the flavor addition is too much or even unnecessary. We’ll evaluate again when the carbonation is done and the serving temperature is appropriate.


¹ Charlie Papazian, The Home Brewer’s Companion <http://www.beertools.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=11625&sid=bc62db82f5350363b0e70498a78a314b#11625> [accessed Sunday, May 2, 2010]

² Michael L. Hall, Ph.D., ‘Brew by the Numbers – Add Up What’s in Your Beer’, Zymurgy (Summer 1995) <http://www.homebrewersassociation.org/attachments/0000/2497/Math_in_Mash_SummerZym95.pdf> [accessed Sunday, February 7, 2010]

Brush Valley Brewing’s Best Bitter (BVB³)

This is my own recipe.

I formulated this recipe to produce five gallons (19 L) of beer for packaging. I assume a loss due to trub of a half-gallon in the fermenter and another half-gallon in the boil kettle. That will leave six gallons (22.7 L) at the end of the boil. I assume a boil-off rate of about one gallon per hour, which means I need 7.5 gallons (28.4 L) at the start of a 90-minute full-volume boil. I use bagged pellet hops for all hop additions.

Recipe: Brush Valley Brewing’s Best Bitter (BVB³)

Brewhouse Efficiency: 70%
Pre-Boil Volume: 7.5 gallons (28.4 L)
BG: 1.033 (8.29 °P)
OG: 1.042 (10.47 °P)
FG: 1.012 (3.07 °P)
ADF: 70%
IBU (Rager): 40
ABV: 3.9%
Color (Morey): 12.6 SRM (32.1 EBC) – Light Copper
Boil: 90 minutes

Grains Weight Percent
Crisp Maris Otter (4 °L) 8 lb. (3.63 kg) 82.1
Simpson’s Medium Crystal (55 °L) 1 lb. (454 g) 10.3
Rahr White Wheat Malt (2.8 °L) 0.5 lb. (227 g) 5.1
Thomas Fawcett & Sons Pale Chocolate Malt (207 °L) 0.25 lb. (113 g) 2.6
 
Hops IBU
Centennial 8.5% AA, 60 min. 1.0 oz (28 g) 32.7
Centennial 8.5% AA, 10 min. 1.0 oz (28 g) 7.1
Centennial 8.5% AA, 0 min. 1.0 oz (28 g) 0
Centennial 8.5% AA, dry hopped 1.0 oz (28 g) 0
 
Yeast
Wyeast 1999 Whitbread Ale

Step by Step

This is a single step infusion mash at 2 qt./lb. with a batch sparge. Mix the crushed grain with 5 gallons (19 L) of 165 °F (74 °C) water to stabilize at 156 °F (69 °C) for 60 minutes. Vorlauf and lauter to collect 3.75 gallons (14.2 L) of wort.

Sparge with 3.75 gallons (14.2 L) of 170 °F (77 °C) water to bring the collected volume to approximately 7.5 gallons (28.4 L). Boil for 90 minutes. While boiling, add the hops according to the hopping schedule. Cool the wort to 68 °F (20 °C). Transfer to a sanitized 6.5 gallon (24.6 L) glass carboy fermenter.

Pitch yeast and aerate the wort. Hold at 66 °F (19 °C) until fermentation is complete. Add dry hops. Let the beer condition for one week and then bottle. Carbonate to 1.0 volumes using 0.5 ounces (14 g) corn sugar. Bottle condition for two weeks.

Cider Notes

When I first decided to make cider, I turned to the home brew forums for answers to my questions. Here is what I found, in the form of an imaginary online conversation.

Gretchen and I have been growing our own apples for years now. We bought a cider press a few years back and have been making ourselves sweet cider every fall. As I get back into home brewing, after a fourteen year hiatus, I thought I would try a hard cider. How many apples will I need to pick to get enough for a batch and which should I use?

On Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:25 am, hiddendragonet wrote:

Grocery store juice/cider is vastly inferior to fresh-pressed, non-preservative cider from an orchard, so definitely go that route if you can.

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

Get your hands on the freshest cider possible, and taste it. If it tastes good, use it in your brew.

On Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:55 pm, Bardon wrote:

If you start with good apples, you get good cider. The juice you buy in the grocery store is made for fresh drinking, not fermenting. If you can’t grow your own or find a local orchard with cider apples, try to stick with a good fresh local juice in season. Another option is to find someone with a cider press and gather unwanted fruit from your neighbors. There’s never a shortage of that! Just getting a juice made from lots of different apples will help your cider taste more like apples.

On Oct 12 2007, at 12:10 AM, bierboy wrote:

One bushel of apples yields 2–3 gallons of cider. You will need several different varieties of apples to make a cider.

On Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:20 pm, Ciderman wrote:

Many orchards will take their apples right from the cooler to the press. I like to let mine sweat a few days in the crates out of the cooler prior to pressing them to maximize starch to sugar conversion.

As a homebrewer, I know that the specific gravity — the measure of the amount of (possibly) fermentable sugar, and hence the potential alcohol — is an important parameter of the recipe. What specific gravity should I expect for apple juice? If it is not high enough, can I add sugar or honey to raise the gravity?

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

Use your hydrometer to determine the specific gravity of your juice and its potential level of alcohol. (Assume that final specific gravity will drop to 1.000.) Adding fermentable sugars, such as honey, molasses, maple sugar, piloncillo or brown sugar will produce more complex flavors and a higher alcohol level.

For traditional cider, shoot for maybe 4% ABV (the BJCP guidelines say 4.5–7.0).

On Apr 26 2008, at 11:15 AM, OldTimeyDave wrote:

My local apple press makes juice upwards around 1.060 at times so it is extremely tough without an original reading. If you’d like to be even more sure the suggestion of taking a reading of the unfermented juice (if possible) is a solid idea, too.

On Jul 30 2007, at 11:20 AM, ewanzel wrote:

Most fresh ciders I have used in the past have around an SG of 1.040-ish. If you want a cider that’s low in alcohol you can always just pitch an english ale/cider yeast (I use S-04) and it will produce good results if given enough time to age/even out. Or as you suggested you can add sugar and/or honey to it, but in my opinion this tends to produce an overly dry cider with a hot flavor due to the alcohol… it takes a long time to age/mellow out. In my opinion the problem with Champagne yeast is that will survive conditions up to around 18% ABV (which means that your cider will ferment to dryness)… in my experience once you ferment to dryness it can be difficult to get a true apple flavor back. If you go with cote de blanc and a bunch of sugar you will be producing more of an country apple wine then a cider (which may not be a bad thing).

On Thu Nov 30, 2006, at 1:01 pm, Denny wrote:

After making many batches of cider, I’ve come to the conclusion that I prefer just juice, with nothing to raise the gravity. It may make it stronger, but in my opinion it doesn’t make it better.

Is it alright to use windfalls?

On Mar 6 2008, at 05:13 PM, Matt the Mead Maker wrote:

The English form of hard cider known as “scrumpy” was originally made with windfalls. In fact, I read somewhere that the term “scrumpy” meant “windfall apples” before it referred to the hard cider drink.

On Mar 8 2008, at 01:18 AM, BeesNBrews wrote:

Windfalls, mostly in good condition, would have been used. Our tendency toward 0% risk has forced commercial producers away from windfalls and all the way into [with hesitation] pasteurization. Face it, you have no control over what might relieve itself on a fallen apple. Come to think of it, you have no control over what winged creature might also relieve itself on an apple

The risk is yours to take. I use windfalls, but also campden. Twenty years ago we wouldn’t even have asked this question. Next thing you know, someone is going to tell us how much alcohol we can make at home; but alas, I digress…

In beer brewing, you boil the wort for a variety of reasons, but one of them is sterilization. Is it necessary to boil the apple juice when making cider?

On Oct 13 2007, at 11:41 AM, wayneb wrote:

In general, heating any juice will do two things — it will drive off volatile aromatics that add “nose” and depth to the flavor profile, and it will cause proteins in the liquid to link into longer chains. That protein thing is what causes heated pectin to “set,” which is a good thing if you’re making jelly, but a bad thing if you want clear cider. The pectin problem can be solved to a great extent by adding pectic enzymes, which will break the pectins back down into smaller compounds that don’t then contribute to haze in the final product. But once the aromatics from a juice are lost through forced evaporation at higher temperatures, there’s no recovering them.

On May 22 2008, at 04:34 PM, Matt the Mead Maker wrote:

If the pasteurization was done with heat, it definitely would have set the pectins. If you live near a homebrew store, just swing by and pick up some pectinase. You’ll only be out a couple of bucks and it’ll clear up any pectin issues in 24 to 72 hours.

On Nov 2 2007, at 04:31 PM, wayneb wrote:

Another tip — if you’re concerned about the viability of natural yeast in your UV pasteurized cider, take a couple of locally grown apples, peel them, and then drop the skins into your cider. Leave them there until the bubbling starts, and then strain ‘em out. That’ll inoculate all the local wild yeast that you need.

BeesNBrews mentioned Campden. What, exactly, is Campden anyway?

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

As an alternative to heating, some cider makers prefer to add 50–100 parts per million (ppm) of sodium or potassium metabisulfite to their freshly squeezed cider before pitching their yeast. This is approximately one Campden tablet per gallon (3.8 L) of must. After you add the sulfite (which will kill any wild yeast and bacteria), allow the must to sit for 24 hours before the yeast is pitched.

On Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:56 pm, hiddendragonet wrote:

If you use campden or KMETA prior to pitching yeast, that vigorous stir the next day is really critical I’ve found. You really need to disburse the gas, or it will have a hard time getting off the ground.

What kind of yeast should I use?

On Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:29 pm, Sapo wrote:

Most here who strongly favor one yeast seem to go with English Cider, Sweet Mead, or wild. English Cider and Sweet mead supposedly do the best job of preserving the apple flavor, and not either skunking it with their own contributions or fermenting it out completely.

On Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:39 am, Denny wrote:

The main differences I note in cider with different yeasts is the dryness and apple character. I’ve found that using wine, champagne, or ale yeasts (especially if you add sugar to the cider) makes a VERY dry, tart cider with little apple character to it. Using natural yeasts, sweet mead, or cider yeast, the cider turns out a little less dry and still has a hint of “apple-ness” to it. Usually these days, I use nothing but fresh pressed apple juice with no sugar or anything else. I either let it ferment naturally or use the WY4766 cider yeast.

On Mon May 08, 2006 2:19 pm, Denny wrote:

I actually prefer “wild fermentation” over any cultured yeast I’ve tried, but there’s one VERY big caveat… I’ve never lost a batch to cultured yeast! For me, I’d say natural fermentation has been at best about 70% effective. The only times I’ve tried it have been when I had enough juice on hand so that I wouldn’t feel too bad if I lost a batch.

On Sep 14 2005, at 03:47 PM, HighTest wrote:

If you are using commercial yeast, make a starter using one quart of cider to one package of yeast.

In October 2007, Nathan Poell wrote:

The day before you brew your cider, make a starter. This step is optional, but it ensures that your yeast is proofed (i.e., alive) and will start fermenting your cider right away.

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

You must, however, aerate the entire mix before primary fermentation.

Do I need to add anything else?

On Jul 14th, 2008, at 11:44 am, Jer Goode wrote:

Ascorbic acid is ok; it’s just vitamin C and is added to preserve color. Winemakers often add it at bottling. It won’t hurt anything. I also add a teaspoon of acid blend, a half of tannin, and some pectic enzyme.

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

Some cider makers prefer to add pectic enzyme — usually at a rate of one quarter teaspoon per 5 gallons (19 L) — to improve the clarity of the end product. Adding yeast nutrients can also be a good idea, especially if you have added a lot of refined sugar to your cider must.

On Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:34 am Denny wrote:

I always use nutrient after having a not so good experience the one time I forgot!

On Sat Oct 04, 2008, at 10:01 am, Denny wrote:

All of my apples are very sweet… great for eating, but they make a kinda “insipid” cider. I find that if I add acid blend and tannin to simulate real cider apple varieties, it makes a much better cider.

Is there anything special about fermenting a cider?

On Sep 16 2007, at 03:55 PM, BikeBrewer wrote:

Fermenting in plastic can be OK, but I prefer to use… glass… You will get oxidation with plastic, so you can’t age at all.

I have heard that some people encounter a “rotten egg” smell during fermentation. Why is that?

On Oct 26 2007, at 10:36 PM, wayneb wrote:

The hydrogen sulfide smell (rotten eggs) comes usually from yeast that are fermenting under stress. The most common cause of that stress is lack of available nutrients, especially available nitrogen. If you detect the sulfide smell early in the fermentation, a dose of Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) yeast nutrient usually does the trick. Later on in the fermentation (after about the 50% attenuation point), the yeast don’t benefit from DAP additions. You can get rid of most of the sulfide smell just from stirring the batch. That will both get the sulfide out of solution, and also eliminate excess CO₂, which can also stress the yeast. If you leave too much sulfide in the cider, it will eventually bond with the alcohol in the brew to make mercaptans, which kind of smell like rotten cabbage, and are much harder to get rid of than the sulfides.

Do I want to rack the cider into a separate vessel for secondary fermentation?

On May 22 2008, at 08:36 AM, ScottS wrote:

My preference is to not put it in bottles until it tastes right. Eliminates the guesswork. Primary until fermentation is finished, secondary until it’s ready to drink, with a racking or two in there if it throws lots of lees.

What are lees?

On Dec 16 2007, at 09:53 PM, mike911 wrote:

Lees, in a nutshell, are whatever settles out of your wine, mead, cider, etc. Quite often it is the “spent” yeast cells that fall out of the must, but could also be fruit or spice particles, or pretty well anything else.

On Jun 14 2007, at 09:03 PM, Nurse Nan wrote:

As cider (or mead or wine or beer) ferments, the yeast multiply (breed) eat the sugar, produce CO₂ and alcohol and die. Dead yeast, impurities in your must and other unfermentable cellular debris (plant cellulose) fall out of solution as the specific gravity drops. If this happens too quickly/early in fermentation, it can sometimes take live/healthy yeast with it. This build up at the bottom of the fermentor are the lees/sediment. If left in place too long, they start breaking down, producing off flavors in your brew. That is why I rack.

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

As in established brewing and winemaking practice, you must transfer (rack) your cider off its dead yeast and sediment. Do this after seven to ten days of fermentation. Leave the still fermenting cider in this secondary fermentation vessel for at least two more weeks.

On Jun 15 2007, at 09:47 AM, mike911 wrote:

In some cases people will leave their wine, mead, etc. on the lees for extended aging, called sur lie aging, which can add different flavors to it like a nutty flavor, but this is something which must be monitored or the nutty can turn into something else, which may not be desirable. I’ve never tried it myself, but there are others here who have, I believe. But yes, the reason is to clarify your final product.

Okay. There is an argument for going long in either primary or secondary. I can appreciate that. Styles and personal tastes and all. How about some typical times, though?

On Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:06 am, sirbrewzalot wrote:

It seems to me its better to wait at least 3 weeks. Ciders ferment slowly, and if you rack it after a week you’ll just have to rack it again because it will continue to ferment and throw lees.

On Wed Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:52 am, Denny wrote:

Be patient and don’t rush it.

On Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:12 am, Denny wrote:

I’ve found that I just need to forget about time completely when I make cider. A month or 2 in primary and 3-6 months in secondary is my usual schedule. Then I give them 1-2 years in the bottle. Cider seems to me to be much more like wine or mead than beer in that respect. But the real answer to how much time to give it is “Until it tastes good to YOU!”. Like most things in brewing, though, patience pays off.

On Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:45 pm, Denny wrote:

Time is on your side… when in doubt, do nothing!

On Oct 23 2007, at 09:01 PM, Stuster wrote:

I’d suggest not being in too much of a hurry with cider. I’ve found that the flavour tends to mellow and meld together from a reasonably long secondary (almost the only time I do secondaries). With my current batch of cider, I did 2 weeks in primary, then 4 months in secondary. It’s crystal clear now, and tasting pretty good.

On Oct 26 2007, at 12:57 PM, OldTimeyDave wrote:

My technique has a lot to do with playing by ear… or well sight, smell and taste in [this case]. I’ll usually let my primary go 2–3 weeks and sometimes a month. It depends on activity, OG, temperature, taste, yeast, etc.

It can sit in secondary for another month or so… Until I am happy with where it is headed and as long as the airlock still active.

On Sep 14 2005, at 03:47 PM, HighTest wrote:

Once primary fermentation is nearly completion (SG 1.010 or less), rack the cider to a sanitized glass carboy. Over the next few months expect the cider to throw lots of lees. Rack every two or three months until lee production stops.

On Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 9:21 am, wayneb wrote:

Now on to the length of time you need to be in the primary — a month is more than I leave any of my ciders, fruit wines, or meads in primary. My interpretation of “end of primary” is when I’m closing in on the final SG that I’d like the brew to have. Then I’ll rack off of the gross lees, which will usually slow fermentation dramatically, and I’ll keep the must in a carboy for several months while fermentation totally finishes up, then the wine clears. In years past, before the desirability of feeding yeast with nitrogen-based nutrients and vitamins was known, primary fermentations of several months were common — especially in meads, since the must from honey is nutrient poor. However, with application of nutrients to your must at the right times and in the right quantities, you can complete primary fermentation of virtually any recipe within a week or two.

What about bottle conditioning?

On Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:19 am, Denny wrote:

I use 1 oz. of corn sugar per gal. of cider for carbonation.

On Sep 14 2005, at 03:47 PM, HighTest wrote:

It is highly recommended to bulk age your cider for approximately 9 months. That is when it will approach it’s peak flavor, and when lee production is more or less finished. You can bottle earlier if desired, but you will likely get significant amounts of nasty tasting lees in the bottles.

On Oct 26 2007, at 12:57 PM, OldTimeyDave wrote:

As a rule I usually carbonate naturally by batch or bottle priming. I don’t think the cider is worth drinking for at least a month or two, 3 months is awesome and some folks say a year is best.

Cider is more of a slow food than beer is and can’t be made as rapidly.

On Jun 19 2008, at 03:51 PM, jwhite751 wrote:

Let them age, you will be amazed at how much better they will be after 3 months minimum. After 6 months you will be very impressed and even your friends will drink them. I have been brewing beer for 15 years and very seldom do they last past 6 months. Cider is just starting to be very good at that point and will continue to improve at a year or more.

On June 23, 2008, at 5:58 pm, krausenator wrote:

Most ciders need a minimum 4–6 months in the bottle to condition before they are good. So you may just need to wait.

I hear a lot of people say their cider is dry or still. Why is that?

On Jul 2 2007, at 12:44 PM, mikesarney wrote:

When you make cider without kegging, you can either have sweet and still, or dry and sparkling.

Adding sorbate inhibits the yeast, and allows you to have sweet cider. The problem is, without the yeasties doing their thing, you get no CO₂ for carbonation.

On Apr 25 2008, at 08:28 AM, ScottS wrote:

Attenuation rates are not applicable to things that have fully fermentable sugars. Cider and mead musts are fully fermentable, so the only barrier to fermenting everything is the alcohol tolerance of the yeast. Unless you add a TON of sugar to your cider, just about any yeast you use is going to ferment it to dryness.

On Apr 9 2007, at 12:12 PM, Matt the Mead Maker wrote:

If you add sorbates and want a sparkling cider, you’ll have to force-carbonate with kegging equipment. You’re not going to get a sweet, naturally carbonated cider due to the fact that fructose (the dominant sugar in apple juice) is 100% fermentable. Malt is not 100% fermentable and that’s why you can have residual sweetness in a beer and still be able to bottle-carbonate with sugar.

If you don’t want to buy kegging equipment and still want a sparkling cider with sweetness, you’ll have to add spices such as vanilla and/or cinnamon which create the perception of sweetness without imparting any actual sugars.

On Apr 9 2007, at 03:07 PM, wayneb wrote:

The other thing you could do is to add a more complex sugar (such as lactose), which will not ferment and will contribute a sweet taste to the result. The trick is to NOT use sorbate or anything else to inhibit the yeast, then to prime in the same way you’d do for a beer, and to also add some pre-dissolved lactose. I’d recommend making up a lactose simple syrup (lactose dissolved in heated water) and adding to taste, but if you want just a recommended recipe most people are satisfied with around 1 to 2 pounds of lactose per 5 gal as a backsweetener. Keep in mind that lactose intolerant people will have a hard time with your cider if you choose to go this way!

On Apr 9 2007, at 04:34 PM, hiddendragonet wrote:

FWIW, I use 2 pounds of lactose in my 5 gallons of cider. Lactose isn’t very sweet, and frankly I doubt you’d even really notice 1 pounds. Two pounds is perfect to give it just a wee hint of sweetness to take the bone-dry tart edge off, at least for my tastes. I like it because like Wayne said, I can sweeten a bit and still bottle carbonate.

On Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:49 pm, hiddendragonet wrote:

Yup, I’ve made 20 gallons of cider this way, with 2 lbs. lactose per 5 gallons. It’s become my standard. For those interested, 2 lbs. sounds like a lot but it really only sweetens it up a little bit because lactose isn’t very sweet. It’s the only way I could find to sweeten naturally while still carbonating in the bottle. Otherwise cider is bone dry.

On Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:00 pm, hiddendragonet wrote:

I saw how hard it would be to get 2 pounds of lactose to dissolve in my cider, so first I boiled a pint of water, added ¾ cups dextrose for priming, and boiled for 5 minutes. Then I added about a quart or more of cider to the pot, raised the heat, and added the lactose. I had it at high heat for 5-10 minutes, stirring constantly. It looked just like milk! As the cider approached the boiling point, the lactose finally dissolved quickly. A couple of stirs and it was finally clear.

In Nov, 2004, Paul Zocco wrote:

You are now at the stage of finalizing, modifying and bottling. If your cider lacks tartness/acidity, you can add malic acid — the acid found in apples — or an acid blend, as used by many winemakers and meadmakers. Try adding 0.5 ounces (14 g), then taste and add more if needed. Likewise, if it lacks sharpness, you can add tannins by adding grape tannins. Start with &frac12; tsp., then add more if taste dictates. If your original sweet cider was a bit low in sweetness or body, you may end up with an extremely dry and flavorless cider.

If you prefer a bubbly version, you would then add three quarters of a cup of corn sugar and a package of Champagne yeast to your 5-gallon (19 L) batch, and proceed to bottle. (If you’ve added sorbate solution to your mix, the carbonation will not work.)

Why do you add Champagne yeast?

On Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:39 am, hiddendragonet wrote:

I let my cider completely drop clear in secondary. This usually takes 2-3 months. Then I prime with ¾ cup dextrose and bottle. No extra yeast is added, and it carbs up every time no problem.

On Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:06 am, BrewBoyTrev wrote:

Generally, that would be true, but when I make my ciders, they typically spend about 2 months in primary, and then 2-4 months in secondary, and another 4-6 months in a third carboy at cool cellar temps. By the time I bottle, I am making the assumption that there is little viable yeast left in suspension. Even if I’m wrong, the $1.50 is a small price to pay to ensure that I have adequately carbonated ciders.

On Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:20 pm, Pseudolus wrote:

Bottling without additional yeast would probably work, but I’d add half a packet anyway just as cheap insurance.

On Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:57 pm, BrewBoyTrev wrote:

At bottling, I add whichever yeast I used to ferment it. I rehydrate it in a little boiled and cooled water, then I pour the yeast and thawed juices into the bottling bucket.

On Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:12 pm, BrewBoyTrev wrote:

I simply rehydrate a packet of yeast, pitch it into my bottling bucket with the priming sugar (sugar, honey or juice concentrate), and then VERY GENTLY stir it to mix it. It works every time.

<

p>From this, I made my Red Cap Cider.